<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FOXless in America</title>
	<link>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/</link>
	<description>...reverberating</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 07:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Pamela</title>
		<link>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11371</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11371</guid>
					<description>Personally I don't get any of my news from mainstream media ... 

There is a strong argument that no source of information is unbiased. This gets into philosophical discussions of the subjective and our relationship to objects ... so I'll leave it at that.

That said, bias isn't a problem when the bias is noted as such. But when you present your "news" as "fair and balanced," when copious information has been revealed about suppressed news stories which favor corporate and elite interests to the detriment of the public, I would take issue with that. Fox News reached my radar for unfairly firing reporters who unearthed the dangers of our farming methods--namely inhumane and dangerous practices of pumping cows with growth hormones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I don&#8217;t get any of my news from mainstream media &#8230; </p>
<p>There is a strong argument that no source of information is unbiased. This gets into philosophical discussions of the subjective and our relationship to objects &#8230; so I&#8217;ll leave it at that.</p>
<p>That said, bias isn&#8217;t a problem when the bias is noted as such. But when you present your &#8220;news&#8221; as &#8220;fair and balanced,&#8221; when copious information has been revealed about suppressed news stories which favor corporate and elite interests to the detriment of the public, I would take issue with that. Fox News reached my radar for unfairly firing reporters who unearthed the dangers of our farming methods&#8211;namely inhumane and dangerous practices of pumping cows with growth hormones.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11370</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 04:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11370</guid>
					<description>I assume you will have all the biased news sources blocked as well? Liberal and conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you will have all the biased news sources blocked as well? Liberal and conservative.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BlueOregon</title>
		<link>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11373</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 10:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11373</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;We own the airwaves&lt;/strong&gt;

By Bill Deiz in Portland, Oregon, a former print and broadcast journalist; now communications director of a statewide non-profit. I was chatting with a soccer dad the other day as we stood on the sidelines and watched our kids play.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We own the airwaves</strong></p>
<p>By Bill Deiz in Portland, Oregon, a former print and broadcast journalist; now communications director of a statewide non-profit. I was chatting with a soccer dad the other day as we stood on the sidelines and watched our kids play.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: pril</title>
		<link>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11369</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11369</guid>
					<description>i would just cancel cable all together.  Oh wait- i haven't had a TV in nine years.  Heh.  Just CHUCK the TV.  Who needs TV anymore anyway? You can get exactly the viewpoint you agree with, and only the viewpoint you agree with online if you want to.  

But, you know, i'm 35 and of the last generation who didn't have to pay to watch TV.   paying for cable is like paying the trash guys to dump the trucks in your living room anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would just cancel cable all together.  Oh wait- i haven&#8217;t had a TV in nine years.  Heh.  Just CHUCK the TV.  Who needs TV anymore anyway? You can get exactly the viewpoint you agree with, and only the viewpoint you agree with online if you want to.  </p>
<p>But, you know, i&#8217;m 35 and of the last generation who didn&#8217;t have to pay to watch TV.   paying for cable is like paying the trash guys to dump the trucks in your living room anyway.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pamela</title>
		<link>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11368</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 08:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11368</guid>
					<description>I'm doing it tomorrow. To Mia, are you serious? For all the crunching of Dixie Chicks CDs (who was FORCING those people to listen and buy?) and boycotting of their concerts, for all the angry calls to CBS over the idiotic Jackson nipple debacle and threats in re: Dan Rather (who forced them to continue to watch CBS?), for all the Michael Moore haranguement and website attacks he has endured (did Moore force his website on his detractors?), you are actually indignant over a boycott of FOX? 

Can you say, hypocricy?

And Mia, we are a capitalistic society. Ending Faux, oh sorry, I meant Fox News is exactly the way to enact change. If you don't like it, don't participate.

Others that so need Fox that they can't cope without it will have to learn what it felt like to be a Gore supporter in 2000, or a Kerry supporter on November 2, 2004. At least this is an honest boycott. You can't always get what you want, and in a society driven by $$ and a "majority rules" mentality, that's just the way it is I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m doing it tomorrow. To Mia, are you serious? For all the crunching of Dixie Chicks CDs (who was FORCING those people to listen and buy?) and boycotting of their concerts, for all the angry calls to CBS over the idiotic Jackson nipple debacle and threats in re: Dan Rather (who forced them to continue to watch CBS?), for all the Michael Moore haranguement and website attacks he has endured (did Moore force his website on his detractors?), you are actually indignant over a boycott of FOX? </p>
<p>Can you say, hypocricy?</p>
<p>And Mia, we are a capitalistic society. Ending Faux, oh sorry, I meant Fox News is exactly the way to enact change. If you don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t participate.</p>
<p>Others that so need Fox that they can&#8217;t cope without it will have to learn what it felt like to be a Gore supporter in 2000, or a Kerry supporter on November 2, 2004. At least this is an honest boycott. You can&#8217;t always get what you want, and in a society driven by $$ and a &#8220;majority rules&#8221; mentality, that&#8217;s just the way it is I guess.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11367</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11367</guid>
					<description>I disagree that not watching is sufficient enough to call attention to the bias, distortion, corporate  pandering, and warlust that is Fox news. The problem is that, unchecked, Fox news has become the new norm for television news in this country. I think a more active boycott could be a useful tool to take the station down a notch or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that not watching is sufficient enough to call attention to the bias, distortion, corporate  pandering, and warlust that is Fox news. The problem is that, unchecked, Fox news has become the new norm for television news in this country. I think a more active boycott could be a useful tool to take the station down a notch or two.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mia</title>
		<link>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11366</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11366</guid>
					<description>I see, so you are implying that if enough people remove Fox from their cable package they will, what, end Fox altogether? Infringing on others' right to watch whatever they want will not encourage them to "see things your way." If your boycott is solely a question of Fox's conduct and not an attempt to drive them off the air, then simply not watching is a sufficient method, for if enough people join you, their ratings will drop and they will feel the economic harm. That way others will still be able to watch if they so choose, without your permission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see, so you are implying that if enough people remove Fox from their cable package they will, what, end Fox altogether? Infringing on others&#8217; right to watch whatever they want will not encourage them to &#8220;see things your way.&#8221; If your boycott is solely a question of Fox&#8217;s conduct and not an attempt to drive them off the air, then simply not watching is a sufficient method, for if enough people join you, their ratings will drop and they will feel the economic harm. That way others will still be able to watch if they so choose, without your permission.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11365</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 02:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11365</guid>
					<description>So what if we're not &lt;i&gt;forced&lt;/i&gt; to watch it? Not every boycott has to be around a forced issue. (E.g. African Americans in Montgomery didn't &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; to ride the buses. The point was that by withdrawing their patronage, they were awarded some political power where they had none before.) 

Ugh, the whole "well, no one's forcing you" argument is not only flimsy, but as I see it basically another way of telling people to quit their complaining. It's a line that kills any sort of dialogue or investigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what if we&#8217;re not <i>forced</i> to watch it? Not every boycott has to be around a forced issue. (E.g. African Americans in Montgomery didn&#8217;t <i>have</i> to ride the buses. The point was that by withdrawing their patronage, they were awarded some political power where they had none before.) </p>
<p>Ugh, the whole &#8220;well, no one&#8217;s forcing you&#8221; argument is not only flimsy, but as I see it basically another way of telling people to quit their complaining. It&#8217;s a line that kills any sort of dialogue or investigation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mia</title>
		<link>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11364</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 01:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.strangechord.com/2004/11/30/foxless-in-america/#comment-11364</guid>
					<description>Gee, that's funny, because I never heard of a cable company FORCING anyone to watch Fox News, or any other channel for that matter...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, that&#8217;s funny, because I never heard of a cable company FORCING anyone to watch Fox News, or any other channel for that matter&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

